长三角地区跨界共建园：时空特征、城市偏好与影响机制

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2024.06.20222066

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

基于政府网站收集的2003—2020年长三角41个城市跨界共建园空间数据，运用ESDA、网络层次聚类和地理探测器等方法对跨界共建园时空特征、城市偏好和影响机制分析。结果显示：① 2003年以来，长三角41个城市跨界园数量整体呈上涨趋势，跨界园地域中心由北向南移动；② 空间上表现为多点扩散的不规则圈层面状分布，并呈现出地域单极趋势，存在较大空间溢出性和阶段均衡性；③跨界园城市形成了5级聚类，分类结果具有城市空间关联性和波动性，第Ⅰ、Ⅱ级城市尤其是盐城、南通等是跨界园区选择的最大偏好城市；④因子交互对于跨界共建园时空分布和地区偏好决定力更大，其首位驱动因子为政策制度，其余驱动因子从大到小依次为培训交流、交流平台、干部挂职、产业科研基地转化、市场开放程度，因子之间存在明显城市空间分异。

关键词: 长三角地区, 跨界共建园, 时空分异, 地理探测器

Abstract:

Based on the spatial data of co-construction parks from government websites, using ESDA, network hierarchical clustering and geographic detector to simulate and analyze the spatial distribution characteristics, urban preferences and influencing mechanisms of co-construction parks. The results show that: ① Since 2003, the number of co-construction parks in 41 cities in the Yangtze River Delta has been on the rise, and the regional center of co-construction parks has moved from north to south; ② Spatially, it is an irregular circle-like distribution with multi-point diffusion,and presents a regional distribution, with huge spatial spillover and equilibrium. ③ The co-construction parks cities have formed 5-level clusters, and the classification results have urban spatial correlation and volatility, and especially Yancheng, Nantong of the first and second level cities are the most preferred cities for co-construction parks selection. ④ Factor interaction has a greater determinant effect on the spatial and temporal distribution and regional preference of co-construction parks. The primary driving factor is policy and system, and the rest of the driving factors in order from large to small are training exchanges, exchange platforms, secondment of cadres, transformation of industrial scientific research bases, and degree of market openness. There are obvious urban spatial differences among the factors.

Key words: Yangtze River Delta Region, co-construction parks, temporal and spatial differentiation, Geographic Detector

王婷, 李禕, 周浩楠. 长三角地区跨界共建园：时空特征、城市偏好与影响机制[J]. 世界地理研究, 2024, 33(6): 102-115.

Ting WANG, Yi LI, Haonan ZHOU. Cross-regional co-construction of parks in the Yangtze River Delta: Spatiotemporal characteristics, urban preferences and influence mechanisms[J]. World Regional Studies, 2024, 33(6): 102-115.

图/表 9

参考文献 58

1	覃艳华,马争,梁士伦.长三角一体化合作协调机制及其对珠三角的启示.宏观经济管理,2009(5):45-47.
	QIN Y, MA Z, LIANG L.The Yangtze River Delta integrated coordination mechanism and its enlightenment to the Pearl River Delta.Macroeconomic Management Macroecon Manag,2009(5):45-47.
2	马学广,鹿宇.尺度重组视角下我国海外园区空间治理体系重构研究.中国海洋大学学报(社会科学版),2021(5):88-99.
	MA X, LU Y.The reconstruction of spatial governance system of China' s Overseas Industrial Parks from the perspective of rescaling.School of International Affairs and Public Administration, Ocean University of China,2021(5):88-99.
3	张衔春,夏洋辉,单卓然,等. 粤港澳大湾区府际合作网络特征及演变机制研究. 城市发展研究,2022,29(1):7-14.
	ZHANG X, XIA Y, SHAN Z,et al. Characteristics and evolution mechanism of inter-governmental cooperation network of Guangdong-Kongkong-Macao greater bay area. City Development Research, 2022, 29(1): 7-14.
4	罗小龙,沈建法. 长江三角洲城市合作模式及其理论框架分析. 地理学报,2007(2): 115-126.
	LUO X, SHEN J. Models on inter-city cooperation and its theoretical implications: An empirical study on the Yangtze River Delta. Acta Geographica Sinica,2007(2):115-126.
5	丁胡送,吴福象,王新新.泛长三角城市群产业转移中的异地产业园区合作机制及模式研究.科技与经济,2012,25(6):96-100.
	DING H, WU F, WANG X. Study on cooperation mechanism and mode of cross industrial park in industrial transfer of Pan-Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration. Technology and Economy,2012,25(6):96-100.
6	晁恒,李贵才,林雄斌.新型城镇化背景下土地财政模式的有效性与合理性探讨.城市发展研究,2014,21(7):7-15.
	CHAO H, LI G, LIN X. Investigate the validity and rationality of land finance in the context of new-type urbanization.City Development Research,2014,21(7):7-15.
7	张鹏,陈雯,吴加伟,等.合作园区类型、合作动力与效应的研究进展与展望.热带地理,2020,40(4):589-603.
	ZHANG P, CHEN W, WU J,et al.Research progress and prospects of cooperation zones:Cooperation type,cooperation motivation,and cooperation effect.Tropical Geography,2020,40(4):589-603.
8	张衔春,栾晓帆,马学广,等.深汕特别合作区协同共治型区域治理模式研究.地理科学,2018,38(9):1466-1474.
	ZHANG X, LUAN X, MA X,et al.Collaborative regional governance model in the construction of Shenzhen- Shanwei Special Cooperation Zone.Scientia Geographica Sinica,2018,38(9):1466-1474.
9	KOLOSSOV V, SCOTT J. Selected conceptual issues in border studies. Belgeo,2013(1):1-20.
10	O'DOWD L. From a 'borderless world' to a 'world of borders': Bringing history back in. Environment and Planning D:Society and Space,2010,28(6): 1031-1050.
11	VAN H. The geopolitics of borders and boundaries. Geopolitics,2005,10(4): 672-679.
12	刘永敬,罗小龙,田冬,等.中国跨界新区的形成机制、空间组织和管治模式初探.经济地理,2014,34(12):41-47.
	LIU Y, LUO X, TIAN D,et al.Preliminary study on China's cross-boundary new district in forming mechanisms,spatial organizations and governance models.Economic Geography, 2014,34(12):41-47.
13	张衔春,杨宇,单卓然,等.珠三角城市区域治理的尺度重构机制研究——基于产业合作项目与交通基础设施项目的比较.地理研究,2020,39(9):2095-2108.
	ZHANG X, YANG Y, SHAN Z,et al. Rescaling of global city-regional governance in the Pearl River Delta:A comparative study on industrial project and transportation infrastructure project.Geographical Research,2020,39(9):2095-2108.
14	雷少华.超越地缘政治——产业政策与大国竞争.世界经济与政治,2019(5):131-154.
	LEI S. Beyond geopolitics: Industrial policy and great power competition.World Economy and Politics,2019(5):131-154.
15	王文,李新庚.基于府际治理的长株潭城市群合作治理研究.科技进步与对策,2009,26(7):14-17.
	WANG W, LI X.Research on cooperative governance of Changzhutan Urban Agglomeration based on intergovernmental governance.Science & Technology Progress and Policy,2009,26(7):14-17.
16	蒋成钢,罗小龙,王绍博.陷入困境的跨界区域主义——对江阴靖江跨界合作的重新认识.现代城市研究,2018(10):60-66.
	JIANG C, LUO X, WANG S.Troubled transboundary regionalism:Reconsideration of Jiangyin-Jingjiang's cross-border cooperation.Modern Urban Research,2018(10):60-66.
17	WEI Y, LU Y, CHEN W.Globalizing regional development in Sunan, China: Does Suzhou Industrial Park fit a Neo-Marshallian district model? Regional Studies,2009,43(3):409-427.
18	PEREIRA A.The Suzhou Industrial Park Experiment: The case of China-Singapore governmental collaboration.Journal of Contemporary China, 2004,13(38): 173-193.
19	CHAN R, XIAN S.Assessing the incentives in regional city-to-city cooperation:A case study of Jiangyin-Jingjiang Industrial Park of Jiangsu Province in the Yangtze River Delta Region.Asia Pacific Viewpoint,2012,53(1): 56-69.
20	ALIGUCA P. Institutional and stakeholder mapping:Frameworks for policy analysis and institutional change.Public Organization Review, 2006,6(1):79-90.
21	XIAN S, CHAN C, QI Z.2015. Booming provincial-led north-south city-to-city cooperation in China: A case study of Suzhou-Suqian Industrial Park of Jiangsu Province.Cities, 46: 44-54.
22	蒋费雯. 城市合作视角下的跨界共建园区模式与绩效研究.南京:南京大学,2016.
	JIANG F.Forms and performance of cooperative parks from the perspective of intercity cooperation:A case study of north-south industrial parks in Jiangsu Province.Nanjing: Nanjing University,2016.
23	PERKMANN M. Cross-border regions in Europe: Significance and drivers of regional cross-border cooperation. European Urban and Regional Studies,2003,10(2):153-171.
24	SOUSA L.Understanding European cross-border cooperation:A framework for analysis.Journal of European Integration,2013,35(6):669-687.
25	POPESCU G. Bordering and Ordering in the 21st Century: Understanding Borders. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield,2011.
26	BREITUNG W.Borders and the city:Intra-urban boundaries in Guangzhou (China). Urban Geography,2012,33(2): 278-294.
27	MARTIN F, BERTRAND K.A dynamic heterogeneous labour demand model for German manufacturing. Applied Economics, 2001, 33(3):339-348.
28	FUËG R."Wirtschaftstuddie Nordwestschweiz 2006/2007". Regio Basiliensis,2007,7(29):1-100.
29	TAYLOR P, ARANYA R.A global 'urban roller coaster'? Connectivity changes in the world city network,2000-2004.Regional Studies,2008,42(1):1-16.
30	JOUVE B, LEFÈVRE C.Metropolitan governance and institutional dynamic//HAMBLETON R, SAVITCH H, STEWART M.Globalism and Local Democracy. Challenge and Change in Europe and North America. London: Springer, 2003: 185-200.
31	HEEG S, KLAGGE B, OSSENBRǕGGE J.Metropolitan cooperation in Europe: Theoretical issues and perspectives for urban networking. European Planning Studies,2003,11(2):139-153.
32	ESPON:METROBORDER. Inception report. Luxembourg, ESPON.(2009-08-06)[2022-04-09]..
33	LI W, PANG X.Econmic exchanges and sectoral and inter city cooperation in Northeast Asia.Chinese Geographical Science,2002(2):2-11.
34	胡俊峰.长三角地区跨区域联合开发区管理机制研究. 南通大学学报(社会科学版),2014,30(5): 14-22.
	HU J.Management mechanism of trans-regional co-construction industrial park in the Yangtze River Delta region.Journal of Nantong University,2014,30(5):14-22.
35	陈雯,孙伟,刘崇刚,等. 长三角区域一体化与高质量发展. 经济地理,2021,41(10): 127-134.
	CHEN W, SUN W, LIU C,et al. Regional integration and high-quality development in the Yangtze River Delta region. Economic Geography,2021,41(10):127-134.
36	苗长虹,张建伟.基于演化理论的我国城市合作机理研究. 人文地理,2012,27(1):54-59.
	MIAO C, ZHANG J. Evolutionary theory and the mechanisms of urban cooperation in China. Human Geography,2012,27(1):54-59.
37	张京祥,耿磊,殷洁,等.基于区域空间生产视角的区域合作治理:以江阴经济开发区靖江园区为例.人文地理,2011,26(1):5-9.
	ZHANG J, GENG L, YIN J,et al.Regional cooperation governance based on the perspective of regional space production-taking jingjiang park in jiangyin economic development zone as an example.Human Geography,2011,26(1):5-9.
38	张衔春,陈梓烽,许顺才,等.跨界公共合作视角下珠三角一体化战略实施评估及启示.城市发展研究,2017,24(8):100-107.
	ZHANG X, CHEN Z, XU S,et al.The evaluation and enlightenment on integrative strategy of Pearl River Delta from the perspective of cross-boundary cooperation. Urban Development Studies,2017,24(8):100-107.
39	晁恒,李贵才,王砾.制度空间下国家级新区空间重构过程与机制:以重庆两江新区为例.城市发展研究,2018,25(6):46-54.
	CHAO H, LI G, WANG S.The restructuring process and mechanism of national-level new areas under the institutional space:The evidence from Liangjiang New Area of Chongqing. Urban Development Studies,2018,25(6):46-54.
40	张衔春,赵勇健,单卓然,等.比较视野下的大都市区治理:概念辨析、理论演进与研究进展.经济地理,2015,35(7):6-13.
	ZHANG X, ZHAO Y, SHAN Z,et al.City- regional governance from the perspective of comparison:Conception clarification,theory development and research progress.Economic Geography,2015,35(7):6-13.
41	马学广,王爱民,闫小培.从行政分权到跨域治理:我国地方政府治理方式变革研究.地理与地理信息科学,2008(1):49-55.
	MA X, WANG A, YAN X.From decentralization to governance-across-boundary: Study on the transfor mation of local government governance methods in China,theory development and research progress.Geography and Geo-Information Science,2008(1):49-55.
42	李禕,吴缚龙,黄贤金.解析我国区域政策的演变:基于国家空间选择变化的视角.现代城市研究,2015(2):2-6.
	LI Y, WU F, HUANG X.Decoding the changing regional policy in China:State spatial selectivity shifts in contemporary China.Modern Urban Research,2015(2):2-6.
43	启宇,余全明.长三角区域战略空间的内涵特征、运行逻辑与规划策略.城市规划学刊,2022(4):71-77.
	QI Y, YU Q.The intrinsic characteristics, operational logics,and planning strategies of strategic spaces in the Yangtze River Delta.Urban Planning Forum,2022(4):71-77.
44	陈柳. 从«规划纲要»看中央对长三角新时代的发展要求.(2019-12-04)[2022-10-25]..
	CHEN L. From the "Planning Outline" to see the central government's development requirements for the new era of the Yangtze River Delta.(2019-12-04)[2022-10-25]..
45	杨玲丽.超越"嵌入性"约束,共建产业园——苏州工业园"飞地经济"促产业转移.经济体制改革,2014(3):105-109.
	YANG L.Beyond 'embeddedness 'constraints,build industrial park together - Suzhou Industrial Park' Enclave Economy' promotes industrial transfer.Reform of Economic System,2014(3):105-109.
46	殷洁,罗小龙.资本、权力与空间:"空间的生产"解析.人文地理,2012,27(2):12-16.
	YIN J, LUO X.Capital, power and space: Decoding "production of space".Human Geography,2012,27(2):12-16.
47	杨玲丽."组团式"外迁:社会资本约束下的产业转移模式——上海外高桥(启东)产业园的案例研究.华东经济管理,2012,26(7):6-9.
	YANG L.cluster migration:Industrial transfer mode under the constraints of social capital--A case study on Shanghai Waigaoqiao (Qidong)'s Industrial Park.Urban Problem,2012,26(7):6-9.
48	蒋费雯,罗小龙. 产业园区合作共建模式分析——以江苏省为例. 城市问题,2016(7):38-43.
	JIANG F, LUO X.Analysis to the cooperative modes of industrial park:A case study on Jiangsu Province.Urban Problem,2016(7):38-43.
49	丁胡送,吴福象,王新新. 泛长三角城市群产业转移中的异地产业园区合作机制及模式研究. 科技与经济,2012,25(6):96-100.
	DING H, WU F, WANG X.Study on cooperation mechanism and mode of cross industrial park in industrial transfer of Pan-Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration. Technology and Economy,2012,25(6):96-100.
50	张保仓,任浩,佟星. 产业园区合作的动因及模式研究.现代管理科学,2017(2):24-27.
	ZHANG B, REN H, TONG X.Research on the motivation and model of industrial park cooperation.Modern Management Science,2017(2):24-27.
51	苏文松,方创琳.京津冀城市群高科技园区协同发展动力机制与合作共建模式——以中关村科技园为例. 地理科学进展,2017,36(6):657-666.
	SU W, FANG C.Dynamic mechanism of coordinated development and collaborative development models of high-tech parks in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration:A case study of Zhongquancun Science Park. Progress in Geography,2017,36(6):657-666.
52	范轶芳,刘长东. 我国跨区域共建园区与区域协调发展:演进历程与动力机制. 科技创新与生产力,2013(7):35-38.
	FAN Y, LIU C.Chinese cross-region co-construction park and regional coordinated development:Evolution process and dynamic mechanism.Technological Innovation and Productivity,2013(7):35-38.
53	经济日报."十三五", 这五年丨长三角一体化从共识走向共建.(2020-10-24)[2022-11-28]. .
	Daily Economic.'13th Five-Year Plan', these 5 years \| Yangtze River Delta integration from consensus to build.(2020-10-24)[2022-11-28]. .
54	张云伟,江海苗. 新形势下深化长三角园区一体化合作机制. 科学发展,2019(8):70-76.
	ZHANG Y, JIANG H.Research on deepening the integration and cooperation mechanism of the Yangtze River Delta park under the new situation. Scientific Development,2019(8):70-76.
55	章宇萍. 基于产业融合的长三角飞地经济发展策略研究. 现代经济信息,2019(1):478.
	ZHANG Y.Research on the economic development strategy of the Yangtze River Delta enclave based on industrial integration. Modern Economic Information,2019(1):478.
56	方晓萍,廖晓玲,邓又军.我国省际高质量发展水平测度.统计与决策,2022,38(5): 111-115.
	FANG X, LIAO X, DENG Y.Country's inter-provincial high-quality development level measurement. Statistics and Decision,2022,38(5):111-115.
57	杨晓俊,朱凯凯,陈朋艳,等. 城市电影院空间分布特征及演变——以西安市为例. 经济地理,2018,38(6):85-93.
	YANG X, ZHU K, CHEN P, et al.Spatial distribution characteristics and temporal-spatial of urban cinema--A case study of Xi'an. Economic Geography,2018,38(6):85-93.
58	王劲峰,徐成东. 地理探测器:原理与展望. 地理学报,2017,72(1): 116-134.
	WANG J, XU C.Geo-detector: Principle and prospective. Acta Geographica Sinica,2017,72(1):116-134.

一级指标	二级指标	三级指标
	城市特征	园区数量
外生指标	政策制度	政府合作协议数
内生指标	信息沟通	市场开放数
		合作交流平台
		干部挂职数
		交流培训数
		科技成果产业基地转化数

一级指标	二级指标	三级指标
	城市特征	园区数量
外生指标	政策制度	政府合作协议数
内生指标	信息沟通	市场开放数
		合作交流平台
		干部挂职数
		交流培训数
		科技成果产业基地转化数

因子	外生指标	内生指标
因子	合作协议	市场开放程度	合作交流平台	干部挂职	培训交流	科技成果基地转化
q 值	0.501	0.083	0.155	0.146	0.187	0.140
解释力排名	1	6	3	4	2	5

因子	外生指标	内生指标
因子	合作协议	市场开放程度	合作交流平台	干部挂职	培训交流	科技成果基地转化
q 值	0.501	0.083	0.155	0.146	0.187	0.140
解释力排名	1	6	3	4	2	5

交互因子	q值	交互因子	q值
合作协议∩市场开放程度	0.689（NE）	市场开发程度∩科技成果基地转化	0.298（NE）
合作协议∩合作交流平台	0.630（BE）	合作交流平台∩干部挂职	0.242（BE）
合作协议∩干部挂职	0.561（BE）	合作交流平台∩培训交流	0.290（BE）
合作协议∩培训交流	0.565（BE）	合作交流平台∩科技成果基地转化	0.265（BE）
合作协议∩科技成果基地转化	0.547（BE）	干部挂职∩培训交流	0.323（BE）
市场开发程度∩合作交流平台	0.376（NE）	干部挂职∩科技成果基地转化	0.243（BE）
市场开发程度∩干部挂职	0.304（NE）	培训交流∩科技成果基地转化	0.140（BE）
市场开发程度∩培训交流	0.300（BE）