The geo-economic relations between Hainan Free Trade Port and Pan-South China Sea countries and its impact factors

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2022.04.20220025

Abstract

Abstract:

The Pan-South China Sea economic circle is one of the most active regions in the global economy. Strengthening the geo-economic relations between Hainan Free Trade Port and neighboring countries is conducive to promoting the construction and improving regional economic and trade cooperation's level. This paper constructed a geo-economic relations index system from the aspects of trade, investment, industry and finance, and explored the evolution and influencing factors of the geo-economic connection pattern between Hainan Free Trade Port and Pan-South China Sea countries through entropy method and grey correlation method. The study found that: ①From 2005 to 2019, the geo-economic connection between Hainan Free Trade Port and Pan-South China Sea countries is at a low level, and there is no significant improvement. Among them, trade relations are relatively close, and investment, industrial and financial relations need to be further strengthened. ②From 2005 to 2019, the temporal and spatial pattern of geo-economic connection between Hainan Free Trade Port and Pan-South China Sea countries changes significantly, and Myanmar and Singapore fluctuate greatly. Overall, Hainan Free Trade Port has the strongest economic relations with Singapore, Vietnam, Brunei and Indonesia, and the weakest economic relations with Laos, India, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka. ③Market is the primary influencing factor of Hainan's geo-economic relations. Cost constraints have a certain impact on the economic relations, while the impact of production factors is limited.

Key words: Hainan Free Trade Port, Pan-South China Sea countries, geo-economic relationship, influencing factors, grey relational analysis

摘要：

泛南海经济圈是全球经济要素最活跃的地区之一。加强海南自贸港与周边国家的地缘经济联系有利于推进海南自贸港的建设，提升区域经贸合作层次与水平。本文基于贸易、投资、产业、金融等方面的综合考虑，构建地缘经济关系指标体系，并通过熵值法和灰色关联法探究海南自贸港与泛南海国家的地缘经济关系演变及其影响因素。研究发现：（1）2005—2019年，海南自贸港与泛南海国家的地缘经济关系一直相对较弱，且未出现显著提升。其中，贸易联系相对紧密，投资、产业、金融联系有待进一步加强。（2）2005—2019年，海南自贸港与泛南海国家地缘经济关系的时空格局变动明显，缅甸、新加坡波动幅度较大。总体来看，海南自贸港与新加坡、越南、文莱、印尼的经济联系最强，与老挝、印度、孟加拉国、斯里兰卡的经济联系最弱。（3）市场是海南自贸港地缘经济关系的首要影响因素，成本约束对地缘经济具有一定影响，而生产要素的影响相对有限。

关键词: 海南自贸港, 泛南海国家, 地缘经济关系, 影响因素, 灰色关联法

Jingya XU, Zhouying SONG. The geo-economic relations between Hainan Free Trade Port and Pan-South China Sea countries and its impact factors[J]. World Regional Studies, 2022, 31(4): 737-747.

徐婧雅, 宋周莺. 海南自贸港与泛南海国家的地缘经济关系演变及其影响因素[J]. 世界地理研究, 2022, 31(4): 737-747.

References 31

1	陈才. 地缘关系与世界经济地理学科建设. 世界地理研究, 2001,10(3): 1-7.
	CHEN C. Geo-relation and course construction of World Economic Geography. World Regional Studies, 2001,10(3):1-7.
2	陆大道, 杜德斌. 关于加强地缘政治地缘经济研究的思考. 地理学报, 2013, 68(6): 723-727.
	LU D, DU D. Some thoughts on the strengthening of geopolitical and geoeconomic studies. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2013, 68(6): 723-727.
3	ACEMOGLU D, AUTOR D, DORN D, et al. Import competition and the great U.S. employment sag of the 2000s. Journal of Labor Economics, 2016, 34(S1): S141-S198.
4	CROOKES P I. Resetting EU-China relations from a values-based to an interests-based engagement. International Politics, 2013, 50(5): 639-663.
5	TONGZON J L.ASEAN-China free trade area:A bane or boon for ASEAN countries? World Economy,2005,28(2): 191-210.
6	BLANCHARD J M F, FLINT C.The geopolitics of China' s maritime silk road initiative.Geopolitics,2017,22(2): 223-245.
7	HERRORO A G, XU J.China's Belt and Road Initiative: Can Europe expect trade gains?. China & World Economy, 2017, 25(6): 84-99.
8	潘忠岐, 黄仁伟.中国的地缘经济战略.清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2008(5):116-122+160.
	PAN Z, HUANG R.China's geo-economic strategy. Journal of Tsinghua University (Philosophy and Social Sciences, 2008(5):116-122+160.
9	毛汉英.中国周边地缘政治与地缘经济格局和对策.地理科学进展,2014,33(3): 289-302.
	MAO H. Geopolitical and geoeconomic situation in the surrounding areas and China's strategies. Progress in Geography, 2014, 33(3): 289-302.
10	杨文龙, 杜德斌, 刘承良, 等. 中国地缘经济联系的时空演化特征及其内部机制. 地理学报, 2016, 71(6): 956-969.
	YANG W, DU D, LIU C, et al. Study on the spatial-temporal evolution and internal mechanism of geo-economic connections of China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2016, 71(6): 956-969.
11	党琴, 胡伟, 葛岳静, 等. 中国与南美洲国家地缘经济联系强度及其影响因素. 地理学报, 2020, 75(10): 2061-2075.
	DANG Q, HU W, GE Y, et al. Geo-economic linkages intensity and its influencing factors between China and South American countries.Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(10): 2061-2075.
12	赵亚博, 胡志丁, 葛岳静, 等. 中国与中亚地区地缘经济关联度的时空演变与类型划分.世界地理研究, 2019, 28(2): 105-113.
	ZHAO Y, HU Z, GE Y, et al. The spatio-temporal evolution and type division of geo-economic correlation degree between China and Central Asia. World Regional Studies, 2019, 28(2): 105-113.
13	高重阳. 云南省与东盟地缘经济联系的时空演变及驱动机制分析. 昆明: 云南师范大学, 2021.
	GAO C. Analysis on the spatial and temporal evolution and driving mechanism of the geo-economic relations between Yunnan province and ASEAN. Kunming: Yunnan Normal University, 2021.
14	丁洪建, 余振国. 城市对外经济联系量与地缘经济关系的匹配分析—以南京市为例.中国软科学, 2008(3): 44-51.
	DING H, YU Z. An analysis of the match between the direction and intensity of urban economic contact and the geo-economic relationship. China Soft Science, 2008(3): 44-51.
15	邓春玉. 基于对外经济联系与地缘经济关系匹配的广州国家中心城市战略分析. 地理科学, 2009, 29(3): 329-335.
	DENG C. Strategic analysis of Guangzhou and national center city based on match of external economic links and geo-economic relations. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2009, 29(3): 329-335.
16	王胜, 黄丹英, 钟天祥.海南加强与泛南海地区国家经济合作探析.南海学刊, 2018, 4(2): 91-98.
	WANG S, HUANG D, ZHONG T. A study of measures for Hainan promoting its economic cooperation with countries in the Pan-South China Sea Area. The Journal of South China Sea Studies, 2018, 4(2): 91-98.
17	程贵,李杰.新发展格局下人民币国际化的空间布局研究—以"一带一路"沿线国家为例.金融经济学研究,2021,36(2):52-66.
	CHENG G, LI J.Spatial layout for the internationalization of the Renminbi under the new development paradigm: A case study of countries along the Belt and Road Initiative Route.Financial Economics Research,2021,36(2): 52-66.
18	张学波, 武友德, 骆华松. 地缘经济关系测度与分析的理论方法探讨—以云南省为例.地域研究与开发, 2006(4): 34-39.
	ZHANG X, WU Y, LUO H. Research on the theory and method for the measurement and analysis of inter-regional economic relationship—Take Yunnan Province as sample. Areal Research and Development, 2006(4): 34-39.
19	苏东辉, 骆华松, 蔡定昆.区外大国与东南亚地缘经济关系测度分析. 世界地理研究, 2013, 22(1): 1-11.
	SU D, LUO H, CAI D. Analysis of geo-economic relationships between the][region of Southeast Asia and major outside countries. World Regional Studies, 2013, 22(1): 1-11.
20	黄宇, 葛岳静, 刘晓凤. 基于库仑引力模型的中美日地缘经济关系测算. 地理学报, 2019, 74(2): 285-296.
	HUANG Y, GE Y, LIU X. Calculation of the geoeconomic relationships between China, the USA and Japan based on Coulomb force model. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(2): 285-296.
21	潘峰华,蒙莎莎.金融化、金融全球化和金融地理学发展.经济地理,2021,41(10):106-116.
	PAN F, MENG S.Financialization, financial globalization and the development of financial geography.Economic Geography,2021,41(10): 106-116.
22	陈明星, 陆大道, 张华. 中国城市化水平的综合测度及其动力因子分析. 地理学报, 2009, 64(4): 387-398.
	CHEN M, LU D, ZHANG H. Comprehensive evaluation and the driving factors of China's urbanization. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2009, 64(4): 387-398.
23	DENG J. Control problems of grey systems. Systems & Control Letters, 1982, 1(5):288-294.
24	赵鹏军, 刘迪. 中国小城镇基础设施与社会经济发展的关联分析. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(9): 1245-1256.
	ZHAO P, LIU D. Analysis of the relationships between infrastructure and socioeconomic development in towns of China. Progress in Geography, 2018, 37(9): 1245-1256.
25	赵媛, 诸嘉. 区域经济一体化的动力机制及组织类型. 世界地理研究, 2007(3): 1-7.
	ZHAO Y, ZHU J. The power mechanisms and organization types of the regional economic integration. World Regional Studies, 2007(3): 1-7.
26	白当伟, 陈漓高. 区域贸易协定的非传统收益: 理论、评述及其在东亚的应用. 世界经济研究, 2003(6): 65-69.
	BAI D, CHEN L. Non traditional benefits of regional trade agreements: Theory, review and application in East Asia. Word Economy Studies, 2003(6): 65-69.
27	张晶, 唐庆辉, 刘建忠, 等.大国在南美洲的地缘影响分析. 世界地理研究, 2019, 28(3): 11-22.
	ZHANG J, TANG Q, LIU J, et al. Geo-influence of the great powers in South America. World Regional Studies, 2019, 28(3): 11-22.
28	周政可, 梁育填, 周克杨. 基于关系视角的中国对外直接投资研究进展与展望. 热带地理, 2019, 39(6): 942-953.
	ZHOU Z, LIANG Y, ZHOU K. Review of Chinese foreign direct investment from a relationship perspective. Tropical Geography, 39(6): 942-953.
29	DONALDSON D. Railroads of the Raj: Estimating the impact of transportation infrastructure. Lse Research Online Documents on Economics, 2010, 32(2): 16487.
30	邓明. 制度距离、示范效应与中国OFDI的区位分布. 国际贸易问题, 2012(2): 123-135.
	DENG M. Institution distance, demonstration and location of China's OFDI. Journal of International Trade, 2012(2): 123-135.
31	宋周莺, 陶蕾, 刘卫东. 海南对外贸易格局演化及其与国内省区市的经济关联. 资源科学, 2021, 43(2): 256-268.
	SONG Z, TAO L, LIU W. Trade pattern change of Hainan Province and its economic connection with provinces in China's mainland. Resources Science, 2021, 43(2): 256-268.

[1]	Qixiang SUN, Baisui LI, Tongyu TIAN, Yehui XU, Hongpu ZHAO. Spatio-temporal pattern of urban vitality in Inner Mongolia and its influencing factors [J]. World Regional Studies, 2023, 32(3): 101-111.
[2]	Zaijun LI, Meijuan HU. Spatial-temporal evolution and formation mechanism of ecological well-being performance in Jiangsu Province [J]. World Regional Studies, 2023, 32(3): 124-135.
[3]	Song YIN, Rui LI, Hongmei YIN. Measurement and influencing factors of placeness perception of ethnic village residents under the background of tourism development: [J]. World Regional Studies, 2023, 32(3): 144-156.
[4]	Jingya XU, Zhouying SONG. The evolution of China's mobile phone export trade pattern and its influencing factors [J]. World Regional Studies, 2023, 32(3): 17-27.
[5]	Xiao XIE, Bin YING, Fangjuan DU, Xiaoyu SONG, Hanyan WU. Regional differences and influencing factors of the health level of women and children in China [J]. World Regional Studies, 2023, 32(2): 82-92.
[6]	Shanshan YAN, Chengliang LIU. Spatial evolution and influential factors of China's foreign technology transfer network [J]. World Regional Studies, 2023, 32(1): 19-30.
[7]	Maolin LIANG, Bangwen PENG, Huasong LUO, Juhua HONG. Measurement of geo-economic relationship between China and neighboring countries and evolution of its spatio-temporal pattern [J]. World Regional Studies, 2023, 32(1): 43-53.
[8]	Shouwei LIU, Yuling ZHANG, Xiwen LIU. Analysis on the dynamic evolution of China's inter-provincial spatial economic development relationship: [J]. World Regional Studies, 2022, 31(6): 1285-1297.
[9]	Renyi YANG, Changbiao ZHONG, Zisheng YANG, fenglian LIU, Haiying PENG. Analysis on poverty influencing factors in deep poverty county of Karst Rocky-desertified Area in Southwest China [J]. World Regional Studies, 2022, 31(6): 1298-1309.
[10]	Xiaojuan ZHANG, Qifeng TANG, Ziwei LIAO. Spatial pattern evolution of R&D enterprises and its influencing factors in Jiangsu Province [J]. World Regional Studies, 2022, 31(5): 1034-1045.
[11]	Kezule MENG, Jianzhong YAN, San WANG. Spatial pattern evolution and interpretation of leisure facilities in central Chongqing [J]. World Regional Studies, 2022, 31(5): 1057-1069.
[12]	Yunjie KANG, Jianping YANG, Lin HA, Jie XIAO. Analysis on the development level and influencing factors of the cryosphere tourism economic zone [J]. World Regional Studies, 2022, 31(5): 1083-1095.
[13]	Ping WANG, Yan CHEN, Yeqing CHENG, Jiehua SONG. Evolution and driving mechanism of urban-rural relationship in Hainan Province [J]. World Regional Studies, 2022, 31(4): 849-861.
[14]	Chunzhu WEI, Wei CHEN, Qi WANG, Yanjun DONG, Gengzhi HUANG. The enlightenments of the port system and functional differentiation in South China to the construction of Hainan Yangpu Free Trade Port [J]. World Regional Studies, 2022, 31(4): 773-785.
[15]	Hong ZHANG, Wen DENG, Yi WANG. Analyses on the spatio-temporal evolution and driving factors of land use in India during 2000—2020 [J]. World Regional Studies, 2022, 31(4): 786-799.