主管单位:中国科学技术协会
主办单位:中国地理学会
承办单位:华东师范大学

World Regional Studies ›› 2023, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (3): 124-135.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2023.03.2020926

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Spatial-temporal evolution and formation mechanism of ecological well-being performance in Jiangsu Province

Zaijun LI1(), Meijuan HU2,3()   

  1. 1.Research Institute of Central Jiangsu Development, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China
    2.School of Tourism and Cuisine, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China
    3.Institute of Tourism Culture, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China
  • Received:2020-12-31 Revised:2021-04-26 Online:2023-03-15 Published:2023-04-04
  • Contact: Meijuan HU

江苏省生态福利绩效时空演化及影响机制研究

李在军1(), 胡美娟2,3()   

  1. 1.扬州大学,苏中发展研究院,扬州 225009
    2.扬州大学,旅游烹饪学院,扬州 225009
    3.扬州大学,旅游文化研究所,扬州 225009
  • 通讯作者: 胡美娟
  • 作者简介:李在军(1989—),男,副教授,博士研究生,研究方向为区域经济发展,E-mail:958163533@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省社会科学基金项目(20SHD009);扬州市“绿杨金凤计划”项目(2021);扬州大学“青蓝工程”优秀青年骨干教师资助项目

Abstract:

Ecological well-being performance integrates the three major systems of economy, society and ecology. It is an effective tool for measuring the sustainable development capacity and reflects both regional inter-generational equity and intra-generational equity. This study uses the Super SBM-DEA model and system dynamic panel regression model to analyze the spatial-temporal evolution characteristics, influencing factors and formation mechanism of ecological well-being performance in Jiangsu province from 2000 to 2017. The study found that: (1) The level of urban ecological well-being performance in Jiangsu province was relatively low, and the overall shape was a "U" characteristic that first declines and then rises. It has experienced rapid decline, slow fluctuations and orderly growth. (2) From a spatial perspective, the difference in ecological well-being performance between regional cities was significant, and there was a significant spatial mismatch between economic growth and ecological well-being performance. The economic well-being performance of the economically developed cities in south Jiangsu was far lower than that of the underdeveloped central and northern Jiangsu cities. (3) The system dynamic panel regression showed that urbanization, economic growth and ecological well-being performance all show a significant U-shaped curve relationship, consumption level and industrial structure advanced played a significant positive driving role, foreign direct investment and energy intensity played a significant inhibitory role, the impact of population density on ecological well-being performance was weak and insignificant.

Key words: ecological well-being performance, spatial-temporal evolution, influencing factors, Jiangsu Province

摘要:

生态福利绩效融合经济、社会、生态三大系统,是衡量城市可持续发展能力的有效工具,反映了区域代际公平和代内公平。对2000—2017年江苏省13座城市生态福利绩效的时空演化特征、影响因素及形成机制研究发现:(1)江苏省城市生态福利绩效年均值较低,为0.455,整体呈现先下降后上升的“U形”变动特征,先后经历快速下降期、缓慢波动期及有序增长期;(2)从空间上看,城市之间生态福利绩效差异显著,经济发展水平与生态福利绩效具有明显的空间错配,经济发达的苏南地市生态福利绩效远低于经济欠发达的苏中、苏北地市;(3)动态面板回归揭示城镇化、经济增长与生态福利绩效均呈现显著的“U形”曲线关系,消费水平和产业结构高级化起到显著的正向驱动作用,外商直接投资和能源强度起到显著的抑制作用,人口密度对生态福利绩效的影响程度较弱且不显著。

关键词: 生态福利绩效, 时空演化, 影响因素, 江苏省