

World Regional Studies ›› 2026, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (10): 50-63.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2026.10.20250532
Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:2025-06-28
Revised:2025-10-01
Online:2026-10-15
Published:2026-10-30
Contact:
Xiyue HU
通讯作者:
胡曦月
作者简介:朴英爱(1963—),女,教授,博士,研究方向为朝韩经济、东北亚区域经济合作,E-mail:piaoya@jlu.edu.cn。
基金资助:Yingai PIAO, Xiyue HU. The impact of Japan's renewable energy consumption on carbon intensity under the background of carbon neutrality: An empirical study based on the PVAR Model[J]. World Regional Studies, 2026, 35(10): 50-63.
朴英爱, 胡曦月. 碳中和背景下日本可再生能源消费对碳强度的影响[J]. 世界地理研究, 2026, 35(10): 50-63.
| 变量 | 样本量 | 均值 | 标准差 | 最小值 | 最大值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| re | 470 | 10 483.52 | 10 630.44 | 416.435 7 | 52 697.69 |
| unre | 470 | 263 343.5 | 268 349.4 | 28 562.96 | 1 361 38 |
| co2_gdp | 470 | 1.255 | 1.286 | 0.098 | 7.006 |
Tab.1 Descriptive statistics of variables
| 变量 | 样本量 | 均值 | 标准差 | 最小值 | 最大值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| re | 470 | 10 483.52 | 10 630.44 | 416.435 7 | 52 697.69 |
| unre | 470 | 263 343.5 | 268 349.4 | 28 562.96 | 1 361 38 |
| co2_gdp | 470 | 1.255 | 1.286 | 0.098 | 7.006 |
| 变量 | Adjusted t | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| lre | -5.737 6*** | 0.000 0 |
| lunre | -3.133 5*** | 0.000 9 |
| co2_gdp | 1.429 3 | 0.923 5 |
| dco2_gdp | -11.928 1*** | 0.000 0 |
Tab.2 Results of LLC unit root test
| 变量 | Adjusted t | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| lre | -5.737 6*** | 0.000 0 |
| lunre | -3.133 5*** | 0.000 9 |
| co2_gdp | 1.429 3 | 0.923 5 |
| dco2_gdp | -11.928 1*** | 0.000 0 |
| 滞后阶数 | AIC | BIC | HQIC |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -4.932 02 | -3.201 29* | -4.241 58 |
| 2 | -5.238 17* | -3.184 76 | -4.414 73* |
| 3 | -4.791 55 | -2.318 31 | -3.794 46 |
| 4 | -4.735 97 | -1.688 9 | -3.501 41 |
| 5 | -3.849 49 | 0.040 366 | -2.268 79 |
Tab.3 Information criterion values (AIC, BIC, HQIC) at different lag orders
| 滞后阶数 | AIC | BIC | HQIC |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -4.932 02 | -3.201 29* | -4.241 58 |
| 2 | -5.238 17* | -3.184 76 | -4.414 73* |
| 3 | -4.791 55 | -2.318 31 | -3.794 46 |
| 4 | -4.735 97 | -1.688 9 | -3.501 41 |
| 5 | -3.849 49 | 0.040 366 | -2.268 79 |
| 变量 | dco2_gdp | lre | lunre | ALL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| dco2_gdp | — | 0.881 4 | 12.048*** | 12.11*** |
| lre | 1.021 | — | 4.139** | 4.331 |
| lunre | 0.151 | 0.366 | — | 0.491 |
Tab.4 Granger causality test results
| 变量 | dco2_gdp | lre | lunre | ALL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| dco2_gdp | — | 0.881 4 | 12.048*** | 12.11*** |
| lre | 1.021 | — | 4.139** | 4.331 |
| lunre | 0.151 | 0.366 | — | 0.491 |
| 变量 | s | lre | lunre | dco2_gdp | 变量 | s | lre | lunre | dco2_gdp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| lre | 1 | 1.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | lre | 9 | 0.984 | 0.016 | 0.001 |
| lunre | 1 | 0.020 | 0.980 | 0.000 | lunre | 9 | 0.009 | 0.991 | 0.000 |
| dco2_gdp | 1 | 0.019 | 0.062 | 0.919 | dco2_gdp | 9 | 0.016 | 0.087 | 0.897 |
| lre | 2 | 0.998 | 0.001 | 0.001 | lre | 10 | 0.983 | 0.016 | 0.001 |
| lunre | 2 | 0.014 | 0.986 | 0.000 | lunre | 10 | 0.009 | 0.990 | 0.000 |
| dco2_gdp | 2 | 0.016 | 0.063 | 0.921 | dco2_gdp | 10 | 0.016 | 0.088 | 0.896 |
| lre | 3 | 0.995 | 0.004 | 0.001 | lre | 11 | 0.983 | 0.016 | 0.001 |
| lunre | 3 | 0.011 | 0.989 | 0.000 | lunre | 11 | 0.009 | 0.990 | 0.000 |
| dco2_gdp | 3 | 0.016 | 0.073 | 0.911 | dco2_gdp | 11 | 0.016 | 0.088 | 0.896 |
| lre | 4 | 0.992 | 0.007 | 0.001 | lre | 12 | 0.983 | 0.017 | 0.001 |
| lunre | 4 | 0.010 | 0.990 | 0.000 | lunre | 12 | 0.009 | 0.990 | 0.000 |
| dco2_gdp | 4 | 0.016 | 0.078 | 0.906 | dco2_gdp | 12 | 0.016 | 0.088 | 0.896 |
| lre | 5 | 0.989 | 0.010 | 0.001 | lre | 13 | 0.982 | 0.017 | 0.001 |
| lunre | 5 | 0.010 | 0.990 | 0.000 | lunre | 13 | 0.009 | 0.990 | 0.000 |
| dco2_gdp | 5 | 0.016 | 0.082 | 0.902 | dco2_gdp | 13 | 0.016 | 0.088 | 0.896 |
| lre | 6 | 0.987 | 0.012 | 0.001 | lre | 14 | 0.982 | 0.017 | 0.001 |
| lunre | 6 | 0.009 | 0.991 | 0.000 | lunre | 14 | 0.009 | 0.990 | 0.000 |
| dco2_gdp | 6 | 0.016 | 0.084 | 0.900 | dco2_gdp | 14 | 0.016 | 0.088 | 0.896 |
| lre | 7 | 0.986 | 0.014 | 0.001 | lre | 15 | 0.982 | 0.017 | 0.001 |
| lunre | 7 | 0.009 | 0.991 | 0.000 | lunre | 15 | 0.009 | 0.990 | 0.000 |
| dco2_gdp | 7 | 0.016 | 0.086 | 0.898 | dco2_gdp | 15 | 0.016 | 0.088 | 0.896 |
| lre | 8 | 0.984 | 0.015 | 0.001 | |||||
| lunre | 8 | 0.009 | 0.991 | 0.000 | |||||
| dco2_gdp | 8 | 0.016 | 0.086 | 0.897 |
Tab.5 Variance decomposition results of the PVAR model
| 变量 | s | lre | lunre | dco2_gdp | 变量 | s | lre | lunre | dco2_gdp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| lre | 1 | 1.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | lre | 9 | 0.984 | 0.016 | 0.001 |
| lunre | 1 | 0.020 | 0.980 | 0.000 | lunre | 9 | 0.009 | 0.991 | 0.000 |
| dco2_gdp | 1 | 0.019 | 0.062 | 0.919 | dco2_gdp | 9 | 0.016 | 0.087 | 0.897 |
| lre | 2 | 0.998 | 0.001 | 0.001 | lre | 10 | 0.983 | 0.016 | 0.001 |
| lunre | 2 | 0.014 | 0.986 | 0.000 | lunre | 10 | 0.009 | 0.990 | 0.000 |
| dco2_gdp | 2 | 0.016 | 0.063 | 0.921 | dco2_gdp | 10 | 0.016 | 0.088 | 0.896 |
| lre | 3 | 0.995 | 0.004 | 0.001 | lre | 11 | 0.983 | 0.016 | 0.001 |
| lunre | 3 | 0.011 | 0.989 | 0.000 | lunre | 11 | 0.009 | 0.990 | 0.000 |
| dco2_gdp | 3 | 0.016 | 0.073 | 0.911 | dco2_gdp | 11 | 0.016 | 0.088 | 0.896 |
| lre | 4 | 0.992 | 0.007 | 0.001 | lre | 12 | 0.983 | 0.017 | 0.001 |
| lunre | 4 | 0.010 | 0.990 | 0.000 | lunre | 12 | 0.009 | 0.990 | 0.000 |
| dco2_gdp | 4 | 0.016 | 0.078 | 0.906 | dco2_gdp | 12 | 0.016 | 0.088 | 0.896 |
| lre | 5 | 0.989 | 0.010 | 0.001 | lre | 13 | 0.982 | 0.017 | 0.001 |
| lunre | 5 | 0.010 | 0.990 | 0.000 | lunre | 13 | 0.009 | 0.990 | 0.000 |
| dco2_gdp | 5 | 0.016 | 0.082 | 0.902 | dco2_gdp | 13 | 0.016 | 0.088 | 0.896 |
| lre | 6 | 0.987 | 0.012 | 0.001 | lre | 14 | 0.982 | 0.017 | 0.001 |
| lunre | 6 | 0.009 | 0.991 | 0.000 | lunre | 14 | 0.009 | 0.990 | 0.000 |
| dco2_gdp | 6 | 0.016 | 0.084 | 0.900 | dco2_gdp | 14 | 0.016 | 0.088 | 0.896 |
| lre | 7 | 0.986 | 0.014 | 0.001 | lre | 15 | 0.982 | 0.017 | 0.001 |
| lunre | 7 | 0.009 | 0.991 | 0.000 | lunre | 15 | 0.009 | 0.990 | 0.000 |
| dco2_gdp | 7 | 0.016 | 0.086 | 0.898 | dco2_gdp | 15 | 0.016 | 0.088 | 0.896 |
| lre | 8 | 0.984 | 0.015 | 0.001 | |||||
| lunre | 8 | 0.009 | 0.991 | 0.000 | |||||
| dco2_gdp | 8 | 0.016 | 0.086 | 0.897 |
| 类别 | 样本量(占比) | isup_ratio均值(标准差) | co2_energy均值(标准差) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 传统工业中碳型 | 256(54.47%) | 2.10(0.59) | 33.23(8.48) |
| 重化工业高碳型 | 135(28.72%) | 2.14(0.95) | 60.29(9.27) |
| 服务业主导低碳型 | 79(16.81%) | 4.27(1.21) | 28.61(9.37) |
Tab.6 Development feature classification results based on K-means clustering method
| 类别 | 样本量(占比) | isup_ratio均值(标准差) | co2_energy均值(标准差) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 传统工业中碳型 | 256(54.47%) | 2.10(0.59) | 33.23(8.48) |
| 重化工业高碳型 | 135(28.72%) | 2.14(0.95) | 60.29(9.27) |
| 服务业主导低碳型 | 79(16.81%) | 4.27(1.21) | 28.61(9.37) |
| [1] | 経済産業省. 2050年カーボンニュートラルに伴うグリーン成長戦略. (2021-06-18)[2025-02-23]. . |
| Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. Green Growth Strategy Through Achieving Carbon Neutrality in 2050. (2021-06-18)[2025-02-23]. . | |
| [2] | 経済産業省資源エネルギー庁. エネルギー基本計画(2025). (2025-02-18)[2025-02-25]. . |
| Agency for Natural Resources and Energy, Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. Strategic Energy Plan (2025). (2025-02-18)[2025-02-25]. . | |
| [3] | SHARIF A, RAZA S A, OZTURK I, et al. The dynamic relationship of renewable and nonrenewable energy consumption with carbon emission: A global study with the application of heterogeneous panel estimations. Renewable Energy, 2019, 133:685-691. |
| [4] | BILGILI F, KOÇAK E, BULUT Ü. The dynamic impact of renewable energy consumption on CO2 emissions: A revisited Environmental Kuznets Curve approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, 54:838-845. |
| [5] | BHATTACHARYA M, CHURCHILL S A, PARAMATI S R. The dynamic impact of renewable energy and institutions on economic output and CO2 emissions across regions. Renewable Energy, 2017, 111:157-167. |
| [6] | LI R R, WANG Q, LI L J. Does renewable energy reduce per capita carbon emissions and per capita ecological footprint? New evidence from 130 countries. Energy Strategy Reviews, 2023, 49:101121. |
| [7] | JUSTICE G, NYANTAKYI G, HAYFORD I. The effect of renewable energy on carbon emissions. Heliyon, 2024, 10:e26894. |
| [8] | IRENA. Renewable power generation costs in 2024. International Renewable Energy Agency, 2025. |
| [9] | Guardian The. World on brink of climate breakthrough as fossil fuels 'run out of road', UN chief says. (2025-07-22)[2025-08-20]. . |
| [10] | 牟初夫,王礼茂,屈秋实,等.主要新能源发电替代减排的研究综述.资源科学,2017,39(12):2323-2334. |
| MU C, WANG L, QU Q,et al. Review on substitution and emission reduction of main new energy power generation. Resources Science,2017,39(12):2323-2334. | |
| [11] | 郭敏晓.风力、光伏及生物质发电的生命周期CO2排放核算.北京:清华大学,2012. |
| GUO M. Life cycle CO2 emission accounting of wind,PV and biomass power generation. Beijing:Tsinghua University,2012. | |
| [12] | 邹治平,马晓茜.风力发电的生命周期分析.中国电力,2003(9):88-92. |
| ZOU Z, MA X. Life cycle analysis of wind power generation. Electric Power,2003(9):88-92. | |
| [13] | 戢时雨,高超,陈彬,等.基于生命周期的风电场碳排放核算.生态学报,2016,36(4):915-923. |
| JI S, GAO C, CHEN B,et al. Carbon emission accounting of wind farms based on life cycle assessment. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2016,36(4):915-923. | |
| [14] | DENHOLM P, ARENT D J, BALDWIN S F. The challenges of achieving a 100% renewable electricity system in the United States. Joule, 2021, 5(6):1331-1352. |
| [15] | BATLLE C. A method for allocating renewable energy source subsidies among final energy consumers. Energy Policy, 2011, 39(5):2586-2595. |
| [16] | WANG Q, WANG S S. Why does China's carbon intensity decline and India's carbon intensity rise? A decomposition analysis on the sectors. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 265:121761. |
| [17] | CHEN C Y, PINAR M, STENGOS T. Renewable energy and CO2 emissions: New evidence with the panel threshold model. Renewable Energy, 2022, 194:117-128. |
| [18] | 王锋,冯根福.优化能源结构对实现中国碳强度目标的贡献潜力评估.中国工业经济,2011(4):127-137. |
| WANG F, FENG G. Contribution potential of optimizing energy structure to achieving China's carbon intensity target. China Industrial Economics,2011(4):127-137. | |
| [19] | 王韶华,于维洋.一次能源消费结构变动对碳强度影响的灵敏度分析.资源科学,2013,35(7):1438-1446. |
| WANG S, YU W. Sensitivity analysis of the impact of primary energy consumption structure change on carbon intensity. Resources Science,2013,35(7):1438-1446. | |
| [20] | 王彩明,李健.一次能源消费结构调整对京津冀碳强度目标的贡献力分析.科技管理研究,2017,37(7):226-233. |
| WANG C, LI J. Contribution of primary energy consumption structure adjustment to carbon intensity target in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. Science and Technology Management Research,2017,37(7):226-233. | |
| [21] | 王新利,黄元生,刘诗剑,等.优化能源消费结构对河北省碳强度目标实现的贡献潜力分析.运筹与管理,2020,29(12):140-146. |
| WANG X, HUANG Y, LIU S,et al. Analysis of contribution potential of optimizing energy consumption structure to achieving carbon intensity target in Hebei Province. Operations Research and Management Science,2020,29(12):140-146. | |
| [22] | Eurostat. Greenhouse gas emission statistics. (2025-01-13)[2025-07-01]. . |
| [23] | 齐绍洲,李杨.可再生能源消费影响经济增长吗?——基于欧盟的实证研究.世界经济研究,2017(4):106-119. |
| QI S, LI Y. Does renewable energy consumption affect economic growth? An empirical study based on EU data. World Economy Studies,2017(4):106-119. | |
| [24] | 黄宁,郭平.经济政策不确定性对宏观经济的影响及其区域差异——基于省级面板数据的PVAR模型分析.财经科学,2015(6):61-70. |
| HUANG N, GUO P. The impact of economic policy uncertainty on macroeconomy and its regional differences: A PVAR model analysis based on provincial panel data. Finance & Economics,2015(6):61-70. | |
| [25] | 経済産業省資源エネルギー庁. エネルギー白書(2024). . |
| Agency for Natural Resources and Energy, Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. Energy White Paper (2024).[2025-05-08]. . | |
| [26] | 帝国データバンク. Corporate financial data report. (2022-02-10)[2025-05-08]. . |
| Databank Teikoku. Corporate financial data report. (2022-02-10)[2025-05-08]. . | |
| [27] | 朴英爱,胡曦月.碳中和视角下日本能源转型动因及实施路径.现代日本经济,2023,42(4):14-27. |
| PIAO Y, HU X. Motivation and implementation path of Japan's energy transition from the perspective of carbon neutrality. Modern Japanese Economy,2023,42(4):14-27. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
