World Regional Studies ›› 2021, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (5): 1048-1060.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2021.05.2020153
Previous Articles Next Articles
Mengcheng LI1(), Chengxin WANG1(), Mingyue XUE1, Weishan QIN2,3
Received:
2020-03-21
Revised:
2020-06-23
Online:
2021-09-30
Published:
2021-09-17
Contact:
Chengxin WANG
通讯作者:
王成新
作者简介:
李梦程(1990-),女,博士研究生,主要研究方向为区域发展与城市规划研究,E-mail:mclisd@163.com。
基金资助:
Mengcheng LI, Chengxin WANG, Mingyue XUE, Weishan QIN. Research on the evaluation and influencing factors of the coupling and coordination of island tourism development and ecological environment in China[J]. World Regional Studies, 2021, 30(5): 1048-1060.
李梦程, 王成新, 薛明月, 秦伟山. 我国海岛旅游发展与生态环境耦合协调评价与影响因素研究[J]. 世界地理研究, 2021, 30(5): 1048-1060.
系统层 | 子系统层 | 指标层/单位 | 权重 | 系统层 | 子系统层 | 指标层/单位 | 权重 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
旅 游 发 展 系 统 A1 | 旅游承载力B1 | 旅游空间密度C1/(人/km2) | 0.0910 | 生 态 环 境 系 统 A2 | 生态脆弱-压力B6 | 海岛距大陆最近距离C16/km | 0.0577 |
日接待游客人次数C2/人 | 0.0498 | 海岛平均坡度C17/。 | 0.0619 | ||||
旅游季节性指数C3 | 0.0435 | 海岛陆海面积系数C18 | 0.0807 | ||||
旅游支持力B2 | 可接待游客酒店数C4/个 | 0.0599 | 自然灾害受灾程度C19/% | 0.0484 | |||
旅行社数量C5/个 | 0.0721 | 人均海域面积C20/km2 | 0.0998 | ||||
公路路网密度C6/ (km/100(km)2) | 0.0532 | 环境资源-状态B7 | 人均可利用土地面积C21/km2 | 0.0815 | |||
旅游吸引力B3 | A级以上旅游景点数C7/个 | 0.0850 | 固体废弃物排放量C22/t | 0.0540 | |||
非物质文化遗产数C8/个 | 0.0899 | 森林覆盖率C23/% | 0.0544 | ||||
地理标志产品数C9/个 | 0.1078 | AQI优良率C24/% | 0.0404 | ||||
旅游延续力B4 | 居民人均可支配收入C10/元 | 0.0468 | 环境保护-响应B8 | 污水处理率C25/% | 0.0721 | ||
旅游管理服务支出占比C11/% | 0.0512 | 垃圾无害化处理率C26/% | 0.0502 | ||||
文化建设支出占比C12/% | 0.0378 | 近岸海域水质达标率C27/% | 0.1281 | ||||
旅游发展力B5 | 旅游经济密度C13/(万元/km2) | 0.0776 | 节能环保支出比C28/% | 0.0821 | |||
旅游占GDP比重C14/% | 0.0685 | 环境建设投资力C29/% | 0.0886 | ||||
住宿餐饮营业收入C15/万元 | 0.0658 |
Tab.1 Evaluation index system of island tourism development level
系统层 | 子系统层 | 指标层/单位 | 权重 | 系统层 | 子系统层 | 指标层/单位 | 权重 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
旅 游 发 展 系 统 A1 | 旅游承载力B1 | 旅游空间密度C1/(人/km2) | 0.0910 | 生 态 环 境 系 统 A2 | 生态脆弱-压力B6 | 海岛距大陆最近距离C16/km | 0.0577 |
日接待游客人次数C2/人 | 0.0498 | 海岛平均坡度C17/。 | 0.0619 | ||||
旅游季节性指数C3 | 0.0435 | 海岛陆海面积系数C18 | 0.0807 | ||||
旅游支持力B2 | 可接待游客酒店数C4/个 | 0.0599 | 自然灾害受灾程度C19/% | 0.0484 | |||
旅行社数量C5/个 | 0.0721 | 人均海域面积C20/km2 | 0.0998 | ||||
公路路网密度C6/ (km/100(km)2) | 0.0532 | 环境资源-状态B7 | 人均可利用土地面积C21/km2 | 0.0815 | |||
旅游吸引力B3 | A级以上旅游景点数C7/个 | 0.0850 | 固体废弃物排放量C22/t | 0.0540 | |||
非物质文化遗产数C8/个 | 0.0899 | 森林覆盖率C23/% | 0.0544 | ||||
地理标志产品数C9/个 | 0.1078 | AQI优良率C24/% | 0.0404 | ||||
旅游延续力B4 | 居民人均可支配收入C10/元 | 0.0468 | 环境保护-响应B8 | 污水处理率C25/% | 0.0721 | ||
旅游管理服务支出占比C11/% | 0.0512 | 垃圾无害化处理率C26/% | 0.0502 | ||||
文化建设支出占比C12/% | 0.0378 | 近岸海域水质达标率C27/% | 0.1281 | ||||
旅游发展力B5 | 旅游经济密度C13/(万元/km2) | 0.0776 | 节能环保支出比C28/% | 0.0821 | |||
旅游占GDP比重C14/% | 0.0685 | 环境建设投资力C29/% | 0.0886 | ||||
住宿餐饮营业收入C15/万元 | 0.0658 |
研究区 | 旅游发展水平(T) | 生态环境质量(E) | 耦合度(C) | 研究区 | 旅游发展水平(T) | 生态环境质量(E) | 耦合度(C) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
长海县 | 0.2138 | 0.4617 | 0.7488 | 定海区 | 0.4827 | 0.4587 | 0.9987 |
长岛县 | 0.4332 | 0.5001 | 0.9898 | 玉环市 | 0.3191 | 0.4219 | 0.9619 |
崇明区 | 0.2211 | 0.4508 | 0.7799 | 洞头区 | 0.4604 | 0.4753 | 0.9995 |
嵊泗县 | 0.3730 | 0.3192 | 0.9880 | 平潭县 | 0.2006 | 0.3460 | 0.8635 |
岱山县 | 0.2812 | 0.3843 | 0.9526 | 东山县 | 0.2442 | 0.4448 | 0.8366 |
普陀区 | 0.7357 | 0.3157 | 0.7063 | 南澳县 | 0.3302 | 0.4995 | 0.9185 |
Tab.2 Comprehensive evaluation results of ecological security of island-type tourism destination
研究区 | 旅游发展水平(T) | 生态环境质量(E) | 耦合度(C) | 研究区 | 旅游发展水平(T) | 生态环境质量(E) | 耦合度(C) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
长海县 | 0.2138 | 0.4617 | 0.7488 | 定海区 | 0.4827 | 0.4587 | 0.9987 |
长岛县 | 0.4332 | 0.5001 | 0.9898 | 玉环市 | 0.3191 | 0.4219 | 0.9619 |
崇明区 | 0.2211 | 0.4508 | 0.7799 | 洞头区 | 0.4604 | 0.4753 | 0.9995 |
嵊泗县 | 0.3730 | 0.3192 | 0.9880 | 平潭县 | 0.2006 | 0.3460 | 0.8635 |
岱山县 | 0.2812 | 0.3843 | 0.9526 | 东山县 | 0.2442 | 0.4448 | 0.8366 |
普陀区 | 0.7357 | 0.3157 | 0.7063 | 南澳县 | 0.3302 | 0.4995 | 0.9185 |
研究区 | 协调度(D) | 协调等级 | 优先度(P) | 发展阶段 |
---|---|---|---|---|
长海县 | 0.5029 | 勉强协调 | 0.4631 | 旅游滞后 |
长岛县 | 0.6796 | 初级协调 | 0.8662 | 旅游滞后 |
崇明区 | 0.5119 | 勉强协调 | 0.4905 | 旅游滞后 |
嵊泗县 | 0.5847 | 勉强协调 | 1.1685 | 同步发展 |
岱山县 | 0.5630 | 勉强协调 | 0.7317 | 旅游滞后 |
普陀区 | 0.5094 | 勉强协调 | 2.3304 | 旅游超前 |
定海区 | 0.6856 | 初级协调 | 1.0523 | 同步发展 |
玉环市 | 0.5970 | 勉强协调 | 0.7563 | 旅游滞后 |
洞头区 | 0.6838 | 初级协调 | 0.9687 | 旅游滞后 |
平潭县 | 0.4858 | 濒临失调 | 0.5798 | 旅游滞后 |
东山县 | 0.5372 | 勉强协调 | 0.5490 | 旅游滞后 |
南澳县 | 0.6173 | 初级协调 | 0.6611 | 旅游滞后 |
Tab.3 Coordination level and priority development stage of tourism development and ecological environment
研究区 | 协调度(D) | 协调等级 | 优先度(P) | 发展阶段 |
---|---|---|---|---|
长海县 | 0.5029 | 勉强协调 | 0.4631 | 旅游滞后 |
长岛县 | 0.6796 | 初级协调 | 0.8662 | 旅游滞后 |
崇明区 | 0.5119 | 勉强协调 | 0.4905 | 旅游滞后 |
嵊泗县 | 0.5847 | 勉强协调 | 1.1685 | 同步发展 |
岱山县 | 0.5630 | 勉强协调 | 0.7317 | 旅游滞后 |
普陀区 | 0.5094 | 勉强协调 | 2.3304 | 旅游超前 |
定海区 | 0.6856 | 初级协调 | 1.0523 | 同步发展 |
玉环市 | 0.5970 | 勉强协调 | 0.7563 | 旅游滞后 |
洞头区 | 0.6838 | 初级协调 | 0.9687 | 旅游滞后 |
平潭县 | 0.4858 | 濒临失调 | 0.5798 | 旅游滞后 |
东山县 | 0.5372 | 勉强协调 | 0.5490 | 旅游滞后 |
南澳县 | 0.6173 | 初级协调 | 0.6611 | 旅游滞后 |
模型参数 | 系数 | T值 | P值 | VIF |
---|---|---|---|---|
D1 | -0.0777 | -0.6816 | 0.5397 | 5.1734 |
D2 | -0.1767 | -1.2257 | 0.3018 | 5.9332 |
D3 | -0.2480 | -3.5040 | 0.0318** | 2.2489 |
D4 | 0.0636 | 0.4104 | 0.70354 | 4.7463 |
D5 | 0.1961 | 1.1593 | 0.3244 | 9.0888 |
D6 | 0.3322 | 2.7459 | 0.0706* | 3.2312 |
D7 | 0.1784 | 1.3185 | 0.2729 | 5.2130 |
D8 | 0.0194 | 0.2647 | 0.8027 | 2.5052 |
R2 | 0.8992 | |||
Adjusted R2 | 0.6306 | |||
Jarque-Bera Test | 10.7449 | |||
AICC | 194.3200 |
Tab.4 OLS linear regression results
模型参数 | 系数 | T值 | P值 | VIF |
---|---|---|---|---|
D1 | -0.0777 | -0.6816 | 0.5397 | 5.1734 |
D2 | -0.1767 | -1.2257 | 0.3018 | 5.9332 |
D3 | -0.2480 | -3.5040 | 0.0318** | 2.2489 |
D4 | 0.0636 | 0.4104 | 0.70354 | 4.7463 |
D5 | 0.1961 | 1.1593 | 0.3244 | 9.0888 |
D6 | 0.3322 | 2.7459 | 0.0706* | 3.2312 |
D7 | 0.1784 | 1.3185 | 0.2729 | 5.2130 |
D8 | 0.0194 | 0.2647 | 0.8027 | 2.5052 |
R2 | 0.8992 | |||
Adjusted R2 | 0.6306 | |||
Jarque-Bera Test | 10.7449 | |||
AICC | 194.3200 |
模型参数 | 数值 |
---|---|
Bandwidth | 167.6754 |
Residual Squares | 0.0122 |
Effective Number | 9.0069 |
Sigma | 0.0640 |
AICC | 190.4686 |
R2 | 0.8998 |
Adjusted R2 | 0.6315 |
Tab.5 Geographical weighted regression results
模型参数 | 数值 |
---|---|
Bandwidth | 167.6754 |
Residual Squares | 0.0122 |
Effective Number | 9.0069 |
Sigma | 0.0640 |
AICC | 190.4686 |
R2 | 0.8998 |
Adjusted R2 | 0.6315 |
1 | 张新放, 吕靖. 21世纪海上丝绸之路港口体系时空格局演变.经济地理,2019,39(11):33-40. |
Zhang X, Lv J. Spatial-Temporal pattern and evolution of port system along the 21st-Century Maritime Silk Road. Economic Geography, 2019, 39(11):33-40. | |
2 | 张海峰,张晨瑶,刘汉斌.从全面经略国土出发推进中国陆海统筹战略取向——评«中国陆海统筹战略取向».区域经济评论,2018(2):151-156. |
Zhang H, Zhang C, Liu H. From the comprehensive land management to promote China co-ordination of land and sea strategic orientation—Evaluation of China co-ordination of land and sea strategic orientation. Regional Economic Review,2018(2):151-156. | |
3 | 肖建红, 王敏, 于庆东,等. 海岛型旅游目的地生态补偿标准方法体系的构建与应用. 生态学报, 2016, 36(2):448-462. |
Xiao J, Wang M, Yu Q, et al. Research on ecological compensation standards for island tourist destinations: The construction and application of methodology. Journal of Ecology, 2016, 36(2):448-462. | |
4 | Azam M, Alam M M, Haroon H M. Effect of tourism on environmental pollution: Further evidence from Malaysia, Singapore and Thailand. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 190:330-338. |
5 | Fadafan F K, Danehkar A, Pourebrahim S.Developing a non-compensatory approach to identify suitable zones for intensive tourism in an environmentally sensitive landscape. Ecological Indicators, 2018, 87:152-166. |
6 | Ioan S. Ecological tourism and public administration in Romania. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2013, 81(2):235-240. |
7 | Olmsted P, Honey-Rosés J, Satterfield T, et al. Leveraging support for conservation from ecotourists: Can relational values play a role. Journal of Sustainable Tourism,2020,28(3):497-514. |
8 | 阿司古力·艾百.乌鲁木齐县旅游经济-生态环境协调发展研究.乌鲁木齐:新疆大学,2019. |
Aibai A.Study on the coordinated development of tourism economy and ecological environment in Urumqi County.Urumqi: Xinjiang University,2019. | |
9 | 童奇正,马丽卿.旅游—生态—创新复合系统协同发展水平研究——以舟山市为例.旅游研究,2018,10(5):31-40. |
Tong Q, Ma L. A research on the synergistic development level of tourism—ecology—innovation system: A case study in Zhoushan City. Tourism Research,2018,10(5):31-40. | |
10 | 王振波,梁龙武,褚昕阳,等.青藏高原旅游经济与生态环境协调效应测度及交互胁迫关系验证.地球信息科学学报,2019,21(9):1352-1366. |
Wang Z, Liang L, Zhu X, et al. Examining the coordination effect and interactive stress between tourism economy and eco-environment in the Tibetan Plateau. Journal of Geo-information Science,2019,21(9):1352-1366. | |
11 | 程慧,徐琼.基于地理探测器的中国城镇化—旅游—生态时空耦合关系研究.中州大学学报,2019,36(4):21-27. |
Cheng H, Xu Q. Study on the coupling relationship of urbanization-tourism-ecology in China based on geographical detector. Journal of Zongzhou University,2019,36(4):21-27. | |
12 | 秦伟山, 孙剑锋, 张义丰,等. 中国县级海岛经济体脆弱性综合评价及空间分异研究. 资源科学, 2017, 39(9):1692-1701. |
Qin W, Sun J, Zhang Y, et al. Research on vulnerability and spatial differentiation on island economies on county level of China. Resources Science, 2017, 39(9):1692-1701. | |
13 | 刘真真. 基于旅游环境承载力的中国海岛县(区)旅游功能区划分与定位研究.青岛:中国海洋大学, 2014. |
Liu Z. The research of tourism function zoning and positioning of Chinese island country (district) based on tourism environmental bearing capacity. Qingdao: Ocean University of China, 2014. | |
14 | 周彬, 虞虎, 钟林生,等.普陀山岛旅游生态安全发展趋势预测. 生态学报, 2016,36(23):7792-7803. |
Zhou B, Yu H, Zhong L, et al. Developmental trend forecasting of tourism ecological security trends: The case of Mount Putuo Island. Journal of Ecology, 2016,36(23):7792-7803. | |
15 | 蒋涤非,宋杰.城市生态可持续性的内涵及其支持系统评价指标体系研究.生态环境学报,2012,21(2):273-278. |
Jiang D, Song J. Study on connotation and evaluation index system for support system of urban eco-sustainability. Ecology and Environmental Sciences,2012,21(2):273-278. | |
16 | 侯伟,翟亮,田莉,等.基于PSR模型的景观人为干扰度综合分析——以北京市为例.地理与地理信息科学,2019,35(6):90-96. |
Hou W, Zhai L, Tian L, et al. An integrative analysis of landscape of landscape hemeroby based on "Pressure-State-Response"model: A case study of Beijing. Geography and Geo-information Science,2019,35(6):90-96. | |
17 | 胡原,曾维忠.基于PSR模型的深度贫困县脱贫进程评价——以四川省为例.长江流域资源与环境,2019,28(12):2867-2878. |
Hu Y, Zeng W. Evaluation of poverty alleviation process in counties at high poverty levels based on PSR model: A case of Sichuan Province. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin,2019,28(12):2867-2878. | |
18 | Ma S Y, Weng J C, Wang C, et al. Bus passenger flow congestion risk evaluation model based on the Pressure-State-Response framework: A case study in Beijing. Science progress,2020,103(1). |
19 | 刘泽华, 章锦河, 彭红松,等. 旅游季节性测度指标的敏感度研究. 地理学报, 2018,73(2):295-316. |
Liu Z, Zhang J, Peng H, et al. Sensitivity analysis of the measures of tourism seasonality. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018,73(2):295-316. | |
20 | 黄旭.ArcGIS软件在地形分析中的应用.科技创新与生产力,2017,(4):70-75. |
Huang X. Application of GIS software in terrain analysis. Applied Technology,2017,(4):70-75. | |
21 | 孙剑锋,李世泰,纪晓萌,等.山东省文化资源与旅游产业协调发展评价与优化.经济地理,2019,39(8):207-215. |
Sun J, Li S, Ji X, et al. Coupling analysis and optimization measures of cultural resources endowment and tourism industry in Shandong. Economic Geography,2019,39(8):207-215. | |
22 | 冯琰玮,甄江红.基于径向基神经网络的呼和浩特市生态安全预警研究.干旱区资源与环境,2018,32(11):87-92. |
Feng Y, Zhen J. The early warning of ecological security in Hohhot based on RBF model. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment,2018,32(11):87-92. | |
23 | 马慧强,廉倩文,论宇超,等.基于BP神经网络的旅游经济系统脆弱性省际空间分异.资源科学,2019,41(12):2248-2261. |
Ma H, Lian Q, Lun Y, et al. Spatial differentiation of tourism economic system vulnerability based on BP neural network in different provinces of China. Resources Science,2019,41(12):2248-2261. | |
24 | 程钰,王亚平,张玉泽,等.黄河三角洲地区人地关系演变趋势及其影响因素.经济地理,2017,37(2):83-89+97. |
Cheng Y, Wang Y, Zhang Y, et al. The evolution trend and driving factors of man-land relationship about the Yellow River Delta Area. Economic Geography,2017,37(2):83-89+97. | |
25 | 陈炳,曾刚,曹贤忠,等.长三角城市群生态文明建设与城市化耦合协调发展研究.长江流域资源与环境,2019,28(3):530-541. |
Chen B, Zeng G, Cao X, et al. Coupling coordination development between ecological civilization construction and urbanization in Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomerations.Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin,2019,28(3):530-541. | |
26 | 滕堂伟,孙蓉,胡森林.长江经济带科技创新与绿色发展的耦合协调及其空间关联.长江流域资源与环境,2019,28(11):2574-2585. |
Teng T, Sun R, Hu S. Coupling coordination and spatial correlation of scientific and technological innovation and green development in the Yangtze River Economic Belt. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin,2019,28(11):2574-2585. | |
27 | 任喜萍,殷仲义.中国省域人口集聚、公共资源配置与服务业发展时空耦合及驱动因素.中国人口•资源与环境,2019,29(12):77-86. |
Ren X, Yin Z. Spatial-temporal coupling and driving factors of provincial population aggregation, public resource allocation and service industry development in China. China Population, Resources and Environment,2019,29(12):77-86. | |
28 | 韩增林,赵启行,赵东霞,等. 2000—2015年东北地区县域人口与经济耦合协调演变及空间差异——以辽宁省为例.地理研究,2019,38(12):3025-3037. |
Han Z, Zhao Q, Zhao D, et al. Population and economic coupling coordinated evolution and spatial differences at county level in Northeast China during 2000-2015: Taking Liaoning province as an example. Geographical Research,2019,38(12):3025-3037. | |
29 | 胡小海,黄震方.江苏区域文化资源与旅游经济耦合特征及其作用机制.江苏社会科学,2017,(1):254-259. |
Hu X, Huang Z. The coupling characteristics and mechanism of regional cultural resources and tourism economy in Jiangsu Province. Jiangsu Social Sciences,2017,(1):254-259. | |
30 | 李恩康,陆玉麒,陈娱.中国外贸货物出口的地理格局演化及影响因素分析——基于货物出口距离和GTWR模型.地理研究,2019,38(11):2624-2638. |
Li E, Lu Y, Chen Y. Geographic pattern evolution of China's merchandise export and its influencing factors:Based on the analysis of merchandise export distance and the GTWR model.Geographical Research,2019,38(11):2624-2638. | |
31 | 马勇,黄智洵.基于GWR模型的长江中游城市群传统村落空间格局及可达性探究.人文地理,2017,32(4):78-85. |
Ma Y, Huang Z. Research on spatial distribution and accessibility of the traditional villages in the urban agglomeration on the middle reaches of the Yangtze River based on GWR model. Human Geography,2017,32(4):78-85. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||