The spatio-temporal evolution of degree of coordination between tourism competitiveness and tourism service exports of major countries along the

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2021.05.2020086

Abstract

Abstract:

Based on the World Economic Forum Tourism Competitiveness Report and the United Nations Commodity Trade Database, using the entropy evaluation method, coupling coordination and relative development model, GIS analysis to study the coupling and coordinated development relationship between the tourism competitiveness and tourism service export of 49 countries along the "Belt and Road" and its space-time evolution.Results show that:(1) The tourism competitiveness of the 49 countries and export of tourism services are in a state of coordination as a whole, which does not change significantly. Most countries have been in a state of moderate coordination for a long time; (2) Obviously, the east-west direction has gradually evolved from a "U" shape to a horizontal line while the north-south direction has gradually evolved from a "U" shape to an "L" shape. Central Asia has the lowest level of coupling coordination, followed by South Asia. East Asia, Southeast Asia, and Central and Eastern Europe are relatively well coordinated; (3) There are two types of coordination and coordination of tourism competitiveness and tourism service export, tourism service export lag has the largest number, accounting for 87.7%, while synchronous countries are mainly distributed in East and West Asia, the number showed a slow increasing trend.China, Thailand, Singapore, Qatar, Cyprus, and the United Arab Emirates have achieved tourism competitiveness and tourism service export synchronization in 2015.

Key words: "Belt and Road" Initiative, tourism competitiveness, tourism service trade export, coupling coordination, time and space evolution

摘要：

基于世界经济论坛《旅游竞争力报告》和联合国商品贸易数据库，采用熵值法、耦合协调度及相对发展度模型、GIS空间分析等方法，分析2007—2015年“一带一路”沿线49国旅游竞争力与旅游服务出口间的耦合协调发展关系及其时空演变。结果表明：①49国旅游竞争力与旅游服务出口整体处于协调状态，随时间变化不明显，多数长期处于中度协调状态；②从空间演变趋势看，耦合协调度区域分异和变化程度均较明显，东西方向上由“U”型逐渐向一字型演变，而南北方向上由“U”型逐步演变为“L”型格局，其中，中亚地区耦合协调度等级最低，其次是南亚地区，东亚、东南亚、中东欧地区耦合协调度相对较好；③各国旅游竞争力与旅游服务出口耦合协调类型分为两类——同步型和旅游服务出口滞后型；其中，以旅游服务出口滞后型数量最多，占比高达87.7%，而同步型国家主要分布在东亚和西亚地区，数量呈现缓慢增长趋势，至2015年该类型国家主要为中国、泰国、新加坡、卡塔尔、塞浦路斯、阿联酋等。

关键词: “一带一路”, 旅游竞争力, 旅游服务出口, 耦合协调, 时空演变

Rong PU, Zhuomin TAO, Tao LI. The spatio-temporal evolution of degree of coordination between tourism competitiveness and tourism service exports of major countries along the "Belt and Road"[J]. World Regional Studies, 2021, 30(5): 948-956.

濮蓉, 陶卓民, 李涛. “一带一路”沿线主要国家旅游竞争力与旅游服务出口协调度时空演变[J]. 世界地理研究, 2021, 30(5): 948-956.

Figures/Tables 6

References 34

1	孙晓东, 倪荣鑫, 冯学钢. 城市入境旅游及客源市场的季节性特征研究——基于上海的实证分析. 旅游学刊, 2019, 34(8): 25-39.
	Sun X, Ni R, Feng X. Study on the seasonal characteristics of urban inbound tourism and tourist market: an empirical analysis based on shanghai. Tourism Tribune, 2019, 34(8): 25-39.
2	孟妮. 旅游贸易引领全球服务贸易增长. 国际商报, 2018-1-8.
	Meng N. Tourism trade leads the growth of global service trade. International Business Daily, 2018-1-8.
3	张国胜,王海文.中外旅游服务贸易国际竞争力比较研究.北京:科学出版社,2016.
	Zhang G,Wang H.A comparative study on the international competitiveness of Chinese and foreign tourism service trade. Beijing: Science Press, 2016.
4	Seyoum B. Revealed comparative advantage and competitiveness in services: A study with special emphasis on developing countries. Journal of Economic Studies, 2007, 34(5): 376-388.
5	Webster A, Fletcher J, Hardwick P, et al. Tourism and empirical applications of international trade theory: a multi-country analysis. Tourism Economics the Business&Finance of Tourism&Recreation, 2007, 13(4): 657-674.
6	田喜洲. 入世背景下的中国国际旅游服务贸易. 社会科学家, 2003, 18(2): 91-94+104.
	Tian X. China's international tourism service trade under the background of WTO accession. Social Scientist, 2003, 18(2): 91-94+104.
7	石金海.我国旅游服务贸易的发展状况及存在的问题分析.当代经济管理,2005,27(5):99-101.
	Shi J.Analysis on the development status and problems of China's tourism service trade.Contemporary Economic Management,2005, 27(5):99-101.
8	Belenkiy M, Rilker D. Modeling the international tourism expenditures of individuals travels. Journal of Travel Research, 2012, 52(2): 202-211.
9	姜义茂, 刘慧芳, 李俊. 以新的评价指标认识我国旅游服务贸易的竞争力. 国际贸易, 2006, 25(11): 42-48.
	Jiang Y, Liu H, Li J. Understanding the competitiveness of China's tourism service trade with new evaluation indicators. International Trade, 2006, 25 (11): 42-48.
10	罗明义.加快对旅游服务贸易政策的研究. 旅游学刊, 2007, 22(2): 10-11.
	Luo M. Speeding up the study of tourism service trade policy. Tourism Tribune, 2007, 22(2): 10-11.
11	Warnock-Smith D, Morrell P. Air transport liberalization and traffic growth in tourism-dependent economies: A Case-history of Some US-Caribbean Markets. Journal of Air Transport Management, 2008, 14(2): 82-91.
12	Prideaux B. Factors affecting bilateral tourism flows. Annals of Tourism Research, 2005, 32(3): 780-801.
13	许培源,陈蓉.中国旅游服务出口地理集中度与出口不稳定性关系研究. 经济地理, 2013, 33(10): 168-173.
	Xu P, Chen R. Research on the relationship between geographical concentration and export instability of China's tourism service export. Economic Geography, 2013, 33(10): 168-173.
14	晁文琦,胡婧玮,王晓云.中美旅游服务产业内贸易的影响因素研究——基于灰色关联分析. 经济问题, 2018, 40(11): 74-79.
	Zhao W, Hu W, Wang X. Research on the influencing factors of Sino-US tourism service industry trade based on Grey Correlation Analysis. Economic Issues, 2018, 40(11): 74-79.
15	Franziska H, Richter P M, Egging R G. A global perspective on the future of natural gas: Resources, trade, and climate constraints. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2015, 9(9): 85-106.
16	Cró S, Martins A M. Structural breaks in international tourism demand: Are they caused by crises or disasters?Tourism Management, 2017, 63(12): 3-9.
17	Melián-González Arturo, Juan Manuel García-Falcón. Competitive potential of tourism in destinations. Annals of Tourism Research, 2003, 30(3): 720-740.
18	田纪鹏. 国内外旅游服务贸易逆差研究前沿与展望. 旅游学刊, 2019, 34(1): 136-148.
	Tian J. Research frontiers and prospects of domestic and foreign tourism service trade deficit. Tourism Tribune, 2019, 34(1): 136-148.
19	胡晓芬, 厉新建, 漆家进. 旅游服务贸易逆差问题再认识. 国际贸易, 2016, 35(7): 62-68.
	Hu X, Li X, Qi J. Recognition of the deficit of tourism service trade. International Trade, 2016, 35(7): 62-68.
20	Jordan Shan, Wilson Ken. Causality between trade and tourism: empirical evidence from China. Applied Economics Letters, 2001, 8(4): 279-283.
21	Aradhyula Satheesh, Tronstad Russell. Does tourism promote cross‐border trade?American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2003, 85(3): 569-579.
22	章锦河, 刘珍珍, 陈静, 等. 中国出境旅游与国际服务贸易关系分析. 地理科学, 2012, 32(10): 1161-1167.
	Zhang J, Liu Z, Chen J, et al. Analysis of the relationship between China's outbound tourism and international service trade. Geographical Science, 2012, 32(10): 1161-1167.
23	王洁洁, 孙根年, 马丽君, 等. 中韩出入境旅游对进出口贸易推动作用的实证分析. 软科学, 2010, 24(8): 30-35.
	Wang J, Sun G, Ma L, et al. An empirical analysis of the promotion of import and export tourism in China and Korea on import and export trade. Soft Science, 2010, 24(8): 30-35.
24	马丽君,孙根年,王洁洁,等.15年来中日出入境旅游对双边贸易的影响.经济地理,2010,30(4):672-677.
	Ma L,Sun G, Wang J,et al.Impact of inbound tourism on bilateral trade in the past 15 years.Economic Geography,2010,30(4): 672-677.
25	石张宇, 周葆华, 沈惊宏, 等. 亚洲九国入境中国旅游与进出口贸易互动关系研究. 资源科学, 2015, 39(9):1871-1879.
	Shi Z, Zhou Y, Shen J, et al. Study on the interactive relationship between tourism and import and export trade of nine Asian countries entering China. Resources Science, 2015, 39(9): 1871-1879.
26	刘丹丽,汪侠,吴小根,等.全球贫困国家旅游竞争力与经济发展的耦合协调度及时空变化.地理科学进展,2018,37(10):1381-1391.
	Liu D,Wang X,Wu X,et al.The coupling and coordination degree of the tourism competitiveness and economic development of the global poor countries and their changes in space and time.Progress in Geography, 2018,37(10):1381-1391.
27	Pulido-Fernández. Rodríguez-Díaz. Reinterpreting the World Economic Forum's global tourism competitiveness index. Tourism Management Perspectives, 2016, 20(4): 131-140.
28	公丕萍,姜超."一带一路"建设对沿线国家经济增长的影响效果与中介路径. 世界地理研究,2021,30(3):465-477.
	Gong P,Jiang C.The effect and mediating path of the"Belt & Road Initiative"(BRI)on the economic growth of BRI countries during 2013-2017.World Regional Studies,2021,30(3):465-477.
29	王兆峰, 霍菲菲, 徐赛. 湘鄂渝黔旅游产业与旅游环境耦合协调度变化. 经济地理, 2018, 38(8):204-213.
	Wang Z, Huo F, Xu S. Changes in the coupling and coordination between tourism industry and tourism environment in Hunan, Hubei, Chongqing and Guizhou. Economic Geography, 2018, 38(8): 204-213.
30	毕国华, 杨庆媛, 刘苏. 中国省域生态文明建设与城市化的耦合协调发展. 经济地理, 2017, 37(1): 50-58.
	Bi G, Yang Q, Liu S. Coupling and coordinated development of provincial ecological civilization construction and urbanization in China. Economic Geography, 2017, 37(1): 50-58.
31	文先明, 王策, 熊鹰, 等. 湖南省新型城镇化与金融支持的耦合协调发展. 经济地理, 2019, 39(7): 96-105.
	Wen X, Wang C, Xiong Y, Xiao J, et al. Coupling and coordinated development of new urbanization and financial support in Hunan province. Economic Geography, 2019, 39(7): 96-105.
32	王玉娟,杨山,刘帅宾,等.开发区居民分类及其空间聚集性分析——以昆山经济技术开发区为例.世界地理研究, 2018,27(6):88-97.
	Wang Y,Yang S,Liu S, et al.Analysis of the classification and spatial agglomeration of residents in development zones: a case study of Kunshan economic and technological development zone.World Regional Studies, 2018, 27(6): 88-97.
33	穆学青, 郭向阳, 明庆忠. 边境地区旅游强度时空演化特征分析. 经济地理, 2019, 39(1): 233-240.
	Mu X, Guo X, Ming Q. An Analysis of the Spatial and Temporal Evolution Characteristics of Tourism Intensity in Border Areas. Economic Geography, 2019, 39(1): 233-240.
34	龚杰. 中国与中东欧主要国家服务贸易的竞争性与互补性研究. 广州: 广东外语外贸大学, 2019.
	Gong J. Research on the competitiveness and complementarity of service trade between China and major Countries in central and eastern Europe. Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, 2019.

目标层	准则层	指标层	权重
目标层	准则层	指标层	2007	2011	2015
旅游竞争力	环境优势	商业环境	0.0417	0.0394	0.0218
		信息通信技术	0.1081	0.0934	0.0589
		健康和卫生	0.0904	0.0718	0.0240
		安全保障	0.0359	0.0288	0.0426
		人力资源	0.0155	0.0086	0.0135
	文化和自然资源	文化资源	0.1865	0.2079	0.3034
	文化和自然资源	自然资源	0.0718	0.0777	0.1324
	旅游观光政策	环境可持续性	0.0231	0.0238	0.0285
	旅游观光政策	旅游观光政策优先性	0.0489	0.0491	0.0294
	基础设施	航空运输基础设施	0.0851	0.1080	0.1485
		地面交通基础设施	0.0667	0.0724	0.0857
		旅游基础服务设施	0.2264	0.2193	0.1114
旅游服务出口		旅游服务出口额	0.4948	0.5212	0.5384
旅游服务出口		人均旅游服务出口额	0.5052	0.4788	0.4616

目标层	准则层	指标层	权重
目标层	准则层	指标层	2007	2011	2015
旅游竞争力	环境优势	商业环境	0.0417	0.0394	0.0218
		信息通信技术	0.1081	0.0934	0.0589
		健康和卫生	0.0904	0.0718	0.0240
		安全保障	0.0359	0.0288	0.0426
		人力资源	0.0155	0.0086	0.0135
	文化和自然资源	文化资源	0.1865	0.2079	0.3034
	文化和自然资源	自然资源	0.0718	0.0777	0.1324
	旅游观光政策	环境可持续性	0.0231	0.0238	0.0285
	旅游观光政策	旅游观光政策优先性	0.0489	0.0491	0.0294
	基础设施	航空运输基础设施	0.0851	0.1080	0.1485
		地面交通基础设施	0.0667	0.0724	0.0857
		旅游基础服务设施	0.2264	0.2193	0.1114
旅游服务出口		旅游服务出口额	0.4948	0.5212	0.5384
旅游服务出口		人均旅游服务出口额	0.5052	0.4788	0.4616

耦合协调度	相对发展度	耦合协调发展类型特征	耦合协调度等级
0≤R＜0.3	0＜S≤0.75	旅游服务出口滞后于旅游竞争力，系统趋于退化	低水平耦合协调
	0.75＜S≤1.25	旅游服务出口同步于旅游竞争力，系统趋于优化
	S＞1.25	旅游服务出口超前于旅游竞争力，系统趋于退化
0.3≤R＜0.5	0＜S≤0.75	旅游服务出口滞后于旅游竞争力，系统趋于退化	中度耦合协调
	0.75＜S≤1.25	旅游服务出口同步于旅游竞争力，系统趋于优化
	S＞1.25	旅游服务出口超前于旅游竞争力，系统趋于退化
0.5≤R≤0.8	0＜S≤0.75	旅游服务出口滞后于旅游竞争力，系统趋于退化	高度耦合协调
	0.75＜S≤1.25	旅游服务出口同步于旅游竞争力，系统趋于优化
	S＞1.25	旅游服务出口超前于旅游竞争力，系统趋于退化
0.8≤R＜1	0＜S≤0.75	旅游服务出口滞后于旅游竞争力，系统趋于退化	极度耦合协调
	0.75＜S≤1.25	旅游服务出口同步于旅游竞争力，系统趋于优化
	S＞1.25	旅游服务出口超前于旅游竞争力，系统趋于退化

耦合协调度	相对发展度	耦合协调发展类型特征	耦合协调度等级
0≤R＜0.3	0＜S≤0.75	旅游服务出口滞后于旅游竞争力，系统趋于退化	低水平耦合协调
	0.75＜S≤1.25	旅游服务出口同步于旅游竞争力，系统趋于优化
	S＞1.25	旅游服务出口超前于旅游竞争力，系统趋于退化
0.3≤R＜0.5	0＜S≤0.75	旅游服务出口滞后于旅游竞争力，系统趋于退化	中度耦合协调
	0.75＜S≤1.25	旅游服务出口同步于旅游竞争力，系统趋于优化
	S＞1.25	旅游服务出口超前于旅游竞争力，系统趋于退化
0.5≤R≤0.8	0＜S≤0.75	旅游服务出口滞后于旅游竞争力，系统趋于退化	高度耦合协调
	0.75＜S≤1.25	旅游服务出口同步于旅游竞争力，系统趋于优化
	S＞1.25	旅游服务出口超前于旅游竞争力，系统趋于退化
0.8≤R＜1	0＜S≤0.75	旅游服务出口滞后于旅游竞争力，系统趋于退化	极度耦合协调
	0.75＜S≤1.25	旅游服务出口同步于旅游竞争力，系统趋于优化
	S＞1.25	旅游服务出口超前于旅游竞争力，系统趋于退化

[1]	Chang LU, Xueyuan XU, Meixuan ZHOU. Analysis on coupling coordination degree of production-living-ecological functions in shrinking cities of China's three major urban agglomerations [J]. World Regional Studies, 2023, 32(3): 76-88.
[2]	Zhiyu CHEN, Weidong CAO, Yachen FAN, Xilong XIANG, Dalong FAN. Research on evolution and coupling coordination of urban innovation capability in Anhui Province based on improved TOPSIS model [J]. World Regional Studies, 2023, 32(1): 92-103.
[3]	Na SONG, Yaqi MAO, Yali HE, Yibo TANG. A study on the coupling and coordination of tourism space among four provinces and cities in the Yangtze River Delta from the perspective of three-dimensional space [J]. World Regional Studies, 2023, 32(1): 104-116.
[4]	Ping WANG, Yan CHEN, Yeqing CHENG, Jiehua SONG. Evolution and driving mechanism of urban-rural relationship in Hainan Province [J]. World Regional Studies, 2022, 31(4): 849-861.
[5]	Yang YANG, Xiaolan TANG, Yanyan JIA, Qiaoqiao Zhan. Spatial-temporal coupling coordination degree and driving factors of population, land and economy urbanization in the Yangtze Basin [J]. World Regional Studies, 2021, 30(5): 978-990.
[6]	Qifa YUE, Xiaoqing ZHAO, Sinan LI, Kun TAN, Junwei PU, Qian WANG. Landscape pattern changes and ecological risk in the Padam River Basin under the background of the "Belt and Road" Initiative [J]. World Regional Studies, 2021, 30(4): 839-850.
[7]	Jihui LIAO, Xianwei PENG, Quan WANG, Ping JIAN, Qingting WU. Study on the coupling and coordination relationship of urban land use benefit in urban agglomeration on the west coast of Taiwan Strait [J]. World Regional Studies, 2021, 30(3): 556-566.
[8]	Zhaofeng WANG, Songsong ZHAO, Xian YANG. Study on the evolvement of coupling coordination between transportation network and tourism resort of urban agglomeration [J]. World Regional Studies, 2020, 29(5): 962-972.
[9]	Shixing JIAO, Anzhou WANG, Xinxin ZHANG, Chongchong ZHANG, Rongqin ZHAO, Linfang CHEN, Jianwei ZHANG. Coordinated development of industrial structure and water resources in Henan Province under the "New Normal" [J]. World Regional Studies, 2020, 29(2): 358-365.
[10]	Xianchao ZHAO, Chao YUAN, Yijue HU. Coupling and coordinated development of urban modernization and ecological in Hunan Province [J]. World Regional Studies, 2019, 28(6): 109-119.
[11]	Fenglong WANG, Yuefang SI. A research on the effects of AIIB on Chinese OFDI in the context of the "B&R" Initiative [J]. World Regional Studies, 2019, 28(5): 1-10.
[12]	Zhouying SONG, Mengyao HAN. An analysis of China-India trade relation in the context of the "Belt and Road" Initiative [J]. World Regional Studies, 2019, 28(5): 24-34.
[13]	Lei ZHAO, Guoliang WANG, Ying WU, Suqiong WEI. Analysis on trade pattern between China and South Asia under the background of the"Belt and Road" Initiative [J]. World Regional Studies, 2019, 28(5): 44-53.
[14]	Mengru REN, Junhua CHEN, Yongtong SONG. An analysis of trade structure and potential between China and Iran under the background of the "Belt and Road" Initiative [J]. World Regional Studies, 2019, 28(5): 54-64.
[15]	Ying ZHU, Lei ZHENG, Lulu WANG, Qi TU. Research on the coordinated development of advantage industries in global innovation cities ——Testimony from 36 American metropolitans [J]. World Regional Studies, 2019, 28(5): 118-129.